Label Cloud

Friday, June 23, 2006

Emotional Spectrum - Warm Fuzzies to Angerfests: Pants really ought to be stronger.

Emotional Spectrum - Warm Fuzzies to Angerfests: Pants really ought to be stronger.

so i got home from a day at wreck beach the other day and i figured something else out. it's been a week of learning BIGtime truths.

at the beach i was hexing and warding off the 21 year old losers from cloverdale who wear knee length shorts and cowboy hats and try to put there blankets down near pairs of naked girls. and i got thinking about dressing provocatively.

there's such a black and white thing about it. girls should dress hot cuz they might be responsible for rapes. the alternative is to dress such as to not enrage male hormones.

first question: why then don't we wear burkas cuz that's what they're for in islam?

but the point i figured out is this: it's not OUR fault that some men have rapist tendencies. to dress so as to not provoke those criminal acts, WE must change OUR ways. that means the rapists among us are allowed to not have to address their rapist tendencies.

what about the middle road: dressing hot cuz it's nice to show off a body i'm proud of and let girls and guys enjoy it WITHOUT FEARING THEY'LL RAPE ME.

then it's the double standard thing: guys can dress hot and slutty and love it and girls love it and everything's ok. what's the difference? the difference is that for probly just biological reasons, women usually CAN'T rape men. we aren't strong enough.

so here's a good sex tip for christian and all girls, but particularly hot christian girls that i'd like to see in more sexy clothes. the next time someone accuses you of dressing slutty and uses the argument that they may incite rape or lust, ask why a woman changing her behaviour is the solution for woman-hating men to be allowed to have rapist thoughts. that should be a conversation stopper.

we deserve to look good without being responsible for others' criminal minds.

that said, ryven's post is a fun little day in the life thing to read about and i won't say what she should or shouldnt do about showing boob flesh in job interviews or other contexts, but it got me thinking about what we should be able to do.

that said, cute girls should show their bodies. we deserve it. and you know what? we're ALL cute!

in touch,
holly

Emotional Spectrum - Warm Fuzzies to Angerfests: More thoughts on religion

Emotional Spectrum - Warm Fuzzies to Angerfests: More thoughts on religion

this chick kicks ass!

she's got her head quite on straight!

in touch,
holly

The lie of men who "honour" women: something i learned today

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Tuesday, June 13, 2006

Sinning!

so i'm housesitting for a friend's cousin for june. vancouver is odd. there's all these new free daily papers. smily folks thrust them at me at busy intersections and the skytrain stations.

the metro, 24hrs, dose...they all seem to be like the ticker running across the bottom of newsworld. factoids without the backstory.

big headlines are kinda silly too.

today's metro is "Sex before 16 is a sin?"

the prime minister's gonna raise the age of consent from 14 to 16 in canada.

so someone goes out and does a morality poll of canadians and finds that 2/3rds think sex before 16 is a sin. well, that's the headline. the poll question actually said immoral.

now, christians know that extramarital sex is a sin. i guess in canada most think 16 should be the lower limit. i didn't lose my virginity until my 20s, but if i could have done it all over again with the ball and chain of a repressive, anti-woman conservative church, 16 would have been about the time for me.

so that's interesting.

also interesting is that 31% think homosexuality is immoral. i guess that includes bisexuality [for me].

but here's something too wierd. only 81% think pedophilia is immoral. wtf?

what are the other 19% thinking? do they maybe not know the definition of the word? are they for some stupid reason unsure? are they interested in diddling kids and admit it to an annoymous pollster by saying they don't think its immoral?

with all the crap the glbt community and liberal christians get, you'd think people would be a little more freaked out about the lack of 100% objection to pedophilia.

or maybe that's just me.